How we assess
Every applicant goes through 5 gates: application, an AI-assisted screen, a live technical assessment scored by a practice lead, a client-fit interview, and reference and credential checks. The questions below come from the live assessment. We score answers on reasoning and trade-offs, not on recalling definitions.
20 technical questions with model-answer hints
Questions 1–10 (role-specific)
Question 1: Walk us through your go/no-go criteria.
Model-answer hint
Capability fit, competitive position, relationship, compliance, margin, resources; a documented decision.
Question 2: How do you build a compliance matrix?
Model-answer hint
Every requirement mapped to a response section, owner and status; reviewed before submission.
Question 3: What commonly gets Etimad submissions disqualified?
Model-answer hint
Missing documents, expired certificates, guarantee errors, format non-compliance, late upload.
Question 4: How do local-content requirements affect your bid?
Model-answer hint
LCGPA scoring, price preferences, staffing and supplier plans, evidence packs.
Question 5: How do you get input on time from busy technical experts?
Model-answer hint
Early kickoff, clear templates, interviews instead of blank pages, firm deadlines, escalation.
Question 6: How do you run colour-team reviews?
Model-answer hint
Pink, red and gold reviews from the evaluator’s perspective, scored against criteria.
Question 7: A late clarification changes the scope. What do you do?
Model-answer hint
Impact assessment, re-plan, pricing review, risk communicated to leadership.
Question 8: What makes an executive summary win?
Model-answer hint
Client priorities first, differentiators with proof, clear value, no boilerplate.
Question 9: What do you do after losing a bid?
Model-answer hint
Requests a debrief, analyses scores, updates the library and go/no-go criteria.
Question 10: How do you manage bank guarantees in a tender?
Model-answer hint
Early request, correct format and value, validity dates, coordination with finance.
Questions 11–20 (Business Development core)
Question 11: How do you build pipeline in a market where you have no relationships yet?
Model-answer hint
research, partners, events, referrals, targeted outreach and realistic timelines.
Question 12: How does public procurement in Saudi Arabia differ from private-sector buying?
Model-answer hint
Etimad, formal tenders, local-content scoring, guarantees, longer cycles, strict compliance.
Question 13: How do you build a stakeholder map for a government account?
Model-answer hint
decision makers, influencers, procurement, technical evaluators, relationships and gaps.
Question 14: How do you turn a technical team’s input into a client-ready message?
Model-answer hint
interview the experts, focus on outcomes, plain language, evidence, expert sign-off.
Question 15: What makes a business case convincing to a board?
Model-answer hint
clear problem, quantified options, stated assumptions, risks, sensitivity analysis, a recommendation.
Question 16: How do you gather competitive intelligence ethically?
Model-answer hint
public sources, customer and partner conversations, no misrepresentation, every claim sourced.
Question 17: How do you price a multi-year services deal?
Model-answer hint
cost build-up, margin targets, indexation, payment terms, risk contingency.
Question 18: How do you work with legal and finance on a bid?
Model-answer hint
early involvement, clear inputs and deadlines, review gates, a sign-off log.
Question 19: How do you measure business development success?
Model-answer hint
qualified pipeline, win rate, deal size, partner-sourced revenue, cycle time.
Question 20: Tell us about a partnership or deal that did not deliver what was expected.
Model-answer hint
early warning signs, actions taken, the lesson applied since.
Interviewer tip: Ask for a real example after every answer. Strong candidates describe what they built, what broke and what they changed.
Practical task
Timebox 3 hours. Given an anonymised government IT tender (scope, evaluation criteria and submission rules), produce a go/no-go assessment, a compliance matrix covering 20 requirements, a bid plan with owners and dates, and a 1-page executive summary in Arabic or English.
How to run it Share the brief 24 hours ahead or run it live. Ask the candidate to talk through trade-offs as they work; reasoning matters more than a finished artefact.
Red flags our practice leads watch for
- Reuses old content without tailoring it to evaluation criteria.
- Cannot explain the disqualification risks of the portals they claim to know.
- Has no structured review before submission.
- Treats bid management as document formatting.
- Universal flag: Vague answers that never reach a concrete system, number or decision the candidate personally owned.
The scorecard we use
Score each dimension 1–4 (1 = no evidence, 2 = partial, 3 = solid, 4 = exceptional):
| Dimension | Weight | What a 4 looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Technical depth, production judgement and security | 40% | Explains how and why, designs for failure and sensitive data, and knows each tool’s limits |
| Practical task and problem solving | 30% | Delivers a working solution with tests and documented decisions |
| Communication and documentation | 20% | Explains clearly to technical and non-technical audiences, in English or Arabic |
| References and regional context | 10% | References confirm the claimed scope; knows the frameworks and data-residency rules that apply |
Pass bar: weighted average of 3.0 out of 4 or higher, with no dimension below 2. The practice lead approves the final result.